Carvin Identification Danelectro Serial. Reading Post-1977 Gibson Serial Numbers Pre-War Gibson. Rickenbacker Serial Number Decoder Rickenbacker. Carvin Guitars DC127M 2 Pickup Guitar Serial Number 125353. Carvin Guitars DC127M 2 Pickup Guitar Serial Number 125353.

LeftyJay wrote:The following quote was taking from this webpage: 'Carvin does not keep an accurate database of serial numbers, and cannot provide any information based solely on a serial number. Because many of the guitars they produce are custom orders, the serial numbers flow as the orders are received, therefore, sequential serial numbers could represent any model guitar or bass.' From a data processing point of view, this is questionable. The order records are computerized. All they have to do is tag the order record with the serial number when it's assigned. The data for every order ever filled would fit on a thumb drive.

They could easily have at their fingertips access to a description of every guitar in their database, by serial number or any other field. They may, in fact, actually have that ability now but have reasons for not wanting to provide that facility.

Rahker wrote:From a data processing point of view, this is questionable. The order records are computerized. No, they're not. Recent orders are in the computer, but that system hasn't been in place that long (we have been building guitars for 60 years, after all). There are dozens of and-written ledgers with every order every placed. So, finding out something about a particular s/n means weeding through all these books, a page at a time - literally, tens of thousands of pages.

We've talked about how nice it would be to build a database with all this information - being the webmaster of the Museum as well as here, I would love it. But the cost of having a contractor manually type in thousands and thousands of guitars with all the options would be extremely expensive. There's no reason at all we wouldn't want to share ths data with people - it's just a matter of cost and time.

Rahker wrote:From a data processing point of view, this is questionable. The order records are computerized. No, they're not. Recent orders are in the computer, but that system hasn't been in place that long (we have been building guitars for 60 years, after all). There are dozens of and-written ledgers with every order every placed.

Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Comment6, Playerlitehj, 947361, Kod_aktivatsii_avast_18. Serijnij nomer i kod aktivacii dlya avtokad 2009 free. KALENDAR OBJAVLJIVANJA STATISTIČKIH PODATAKA ZA 2009. CALENDAR OF STATISTICAL DATA ISSUES IN 2009. This Calendar contains the review of publications planned to be issued in 2009 and by May 2010, which depends on when the processing of a particular statistical survey can be finished and on whether it is feasible to make a particular kind of. Zephar 27.04.16 13:28 comment6, http://www.deonttoveringvandewaanzin.nl/?Zhurnal_ucheta_provedeniya_trenirovok_po_evakuacii_na_sluchaj_pozhara&option=com_k2&view.

So, finding out something about a particular s/n means weeding through all these books, a page at a time - literally, tens of thousands of pages. We've talked about how nice it would be to build a database with all this information - being the webmaster of the Museum as well as here, I would love it.

But the cost of having a contractor manually type in thousands and thousands of guitars with all the options would be extremely expensive. There's no reason at all we wouldn't want to share ths data with people - it's just a matter of cost and time. Of course, I didn't mean that all orders for the last 60 years were computerized. But since they are now, there's little excuse for not being able to search on serial numbers. As for sharing info, some companies skirt any privacy issues by denying all information. Kevio wrote:We've talked about how nice it would be to build a database with all this information - being the webmaster of the Museum as well as here, I would love it. But the cost of having a contractor manually type in thousands and thousands of guitars with all the options would be extremely expensive.

My girlfriend works two jobs now, so I've got some free time. I'll work cheap. I've got Excel and Access. If the paper ledgers were scanned, we could make it a community project of the members of this forum to extract the data.

Helloooo forum, Sorry to create another amp thread, but I didn't want to step on anybody's feet in the other threads. In any case, in light of having a 4003 on the way I've wanted to upgrade my G-K Backline setup.

I keep looking at all of the options (G-K, Ampeg, Ashdown, Hartke, etc.) but I keep coming back to Carvin. I have yet to read a bad review and their prices are too good to be true! I was looking at this setup: BX600 600W amp BR118 1x18 cab BR210 2x10 cab So, I just want to know what the owners think. What other equipment have you played and what about Carvin convinced you it was the best for your RIC bass? Many thanks, Dan. I played the exact setup you're describing (except with a 4 X 10 cab, as they didn't have a 2 X 10 in stock) at the Carvin store in Hollywood last month.

It was the best bass sound I have heard yet for my 4001. It was plentifully loud with lots well-defined, punchy bottom (obviously, from an 18') and loads of tight top end. It got a little warm and fuzzy (but not sloppy) when I played double stops and went exploring above the 9th fret. Several employees and customers came over to check out my Rick and marvel at the killer tone, which was easy to get. I'm sure with tweak time, it would be utterly awesome. For the price, it will be hard to beat. I'm looking at buying either this setup or a similar rig with a G-K head and Hartke cabs.